Re: Catching errors

Norman Walsh wrote:
> If we have just a p:catch in V1 then we can extend it in the future if
> we really see that error codes returned by steps are useful and used.

Maybe not for standard steps, but what about errors raised by p:error in 
pipeline libraries? My feeling is that it'll be specially important for 
XProc-based web application engines, not a corner case.

Cheers,
Rui