W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Serialization Control

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:21:11 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0707111721v3a4e8bc8md124cdd17d8618f8@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 7/11/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote:
> I've considered a number of different ways for an author to declare their
> serialization intent within pipelines.  We have this set of options:
>    1. version                - The version of XML (i.e. 1.0 or 1.1).
>    [...]

Can we make a reference to the Serialization section of the XSLT
specification, instead of having our own list of attributes?

> As such, I propose we add a "p:serialization" element to allow an author
> to declare a set of serialization options and give them a name.

Sounds good to me.

> We then allow p:log and p:output to have an optional 'serialization'
> attribute whose name [...]

I am unconvinced we need this on p:log, as p:log is intended for
logging, and the pipeline author should not rely on the log file being
formatted in a certain way. I would rather see this be configured

Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 00:21:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:43 UTC