W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Implicit and explicit input bindings

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:43:29 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <871wfe99hq.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| If px:step-name has no primary input ports, then in the first of those
| the default readable port will be connected to the 'foo' port, but in
| the second nothing will be bound to any of the step's input ports.

Thank you. Brain cramp.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | In science, "fact" can only mean
http://nwalsh.com/            | "confirmed to such a degree that it
                              | would be perverse to withhold
                              | provisional assent." I suppose that
                              | apples might start to rise tomorrow,
                              | but the possibility does not merit
                              | equal time in physics
                              | classrooms.--Stephen J. Gould

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 16:43:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:43 UTC