W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: component with no inputs

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 23:56:24 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0707061456r24aba739hb400433ac9d72e33@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 7/6/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> May be it is a kind of strange question, but, did we say something
> about the order of component evaluation ?
>
> I just read
>
> "The result of evaluating a pipeline is the result of evaluating the
> steps that it contains, in the order determined by the connections
> between them"
>
> We have p:load and p:error that have no input
> Since p:load has output, we can determine an order for evaluation (not
> a total order)
> But this is not true for p:error
> does this mean that we can throw the error anywhen
> so a clever implementation would throw it first
> so it means that when you have an error step, it is useful to now that
> no step at same level would be executed
>
> Do I miss something ?
>

Yes I do !!
you can create dependency through the use of p:pipe in p:option code
and description !

Mohamed


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 21:56:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT