Re: p:input doppelgangers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alessandro Vernet writes:

> With this in mind, p:empty should not be allowed.

I strongly disagree -- this makes the user do work instead of the
implementors, which is the wrong way around.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGjTnZkjnJixAXWBoRAgO6AJ9zPvvhOO0J/4ioBOaFO7mRabvN3ACggqEa
aJ2Lp1Vij4vinMlzWNZzt4E=
=rZEV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 18:35:27 UTC