-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alessandro Vernet writes: > With this in mind, p:empty should not be allowed. I strongly disagree -- this makes the user do work instead of the implementors, which is the wrong way around. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGjTnZkjnJixAXWBoRAgO6AJ9zPvvhOO0J/4ioBOaFO7mRabvN3ACggqEa aJ2Lp1Vij4vinMlzWNZzt4E= =rZEV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 18:35:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT