W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2007

Re: XInclude Component

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:47:40 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0701311347p5210e244wf00960aa4a8252c6@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>, "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

Hum..I'm asking this question because XInclude has already his own
fallback mecanism. Should we say that this mecanism is transparent for
this component ?

On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What are the case when the component fails ?
>
>
> It would fail on a malformed Xinclude or when the resource pointed to
> does not exist.
>
> To some extent, we defer to what XInclude says is an error.
>
> --
>
> --Alex Milowski
> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
> considered."
>
> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 21:47:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT