W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Examples of pipelines, various

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:20:46 -0800
Message-ID: <28d56ece0702170820ua0c2d0cu4a4d91e18de65f24@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 2/17/07, Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt> wrote:
> So, with this direct syntax on steps, what happens when I have a
> pipeline library defining a pipeline "my-pipe" and want to use it inside
> another pipeline? Currently, we could do it with something like
> <p:step type="my-pipe">...</p:step>
> IMHO, with the direct syntax there is no way to do it. Maybe we need a
> <p:call-pipeline /> ? Or am I missing something?

A pipeline defines a component type and so the invocation would be the same
as any other component:

<my-pipe> ... </my-pipe>

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Saturday, 17 February 2007 16:20:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:41 UTC