W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Editorial: p:xpath-context

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:36:42 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87fy9gvhqd.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say:
| Should we have a definition of the syntax for p:xpath-context
| somewhere in the specification? It seems to be missing at this point.

It is missing, and yes we must define it. My editorial draft was
intended to be "just enough" to get buy in to the direction. After
we've settled some issues, I'll do another draft with dotted i's and
crossed t's.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:37:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT