W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > December 2007

Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:37:05 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2tzmn95mm.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
|> | 5) Change the definition of p:pipe so that 'step' is optional, and if
|> |    omitted means the lexically inclosing p:pipeline.
|>
|> This seems orthogonal. And if we're goint to reopen discussion of
|> making step and/or port optional on p:pipe, I have a different
|> proposal :-)
|
| It's crucially _not_ orthogonal, it's necessary!

Ah, yes. I'd missed the significance of step 5.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.

Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 17:37:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT