/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | On 8/29/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: |> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: |> | Example 3 is not a valid xproc instance : no primary input defined |> |> It gets one by default per our new rules. | | ?? The p:choose ?? Ack. Right. Test cases, we need test cases. So, I *think* that it's sufficient to add an explicit p:input on the p:pipeline. Then choose gets that as it's default readable port and each when will, by default, bind its unbound inputs to the default readable port. Right? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We have fewer friends than we imagine, http://nwalsh.com/ | but more than we know.--Hugo Von | HofmannsthalReceived on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 14:45:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT