Re: QName as a defined term

Norman Walsh wrote:
> Henry suggested that we need a defined term for QName because we
> sometimes define namespaces in a non-standard way. I constructed the
> following:
> 
> <para><termdef xml:id="dt-QName">In the context of XProc, a
> <firstterm>QName</firstterm> is almost always a QName in the 
> <biblioref linkend="xmlns10"/> (or <biblioref linkend="xmlns11"/>, as
> appropriate) sense. Note, however, that <tag>p:option</tag> and
> <tag>p:parameter</tag> values can get their namespace declarations in
> a non-standard way (with <tag>p:parameters</tag>).</termdef>
> </para>

Presumably the "(with <tag>p:parameters</tag>)" at the end there 
actually reads "(with <tag>p:namespaces</tag>)"...

Jeni
-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com