W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: QName as a defined term

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:08:15 +0100
Message-ID: <46D57DCF.1090609@jenitennison.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

Norman Walsh wrote:
> Henry suggested that we need a defined term for QName because we
> sometimes define namespaces in a non-standard way. I constructed the
> following:
> <para><termdef xml:id="dt-QName">In the context of XProc, a
> <firstterm>QName</firstterm> is almost always a QName in the 
> <biblioref linkend="xmlns10"/> (or <biblioref linkend="xmlns11"/>, as
> appropriate) sense. Note, however, that <tag>p:option</tag> and
> <tag>p:parameter</tag> values can get their namespace declarations in
> a non-standard way (with <tag>p:parameters</tag>).</termdef>
> </para>

Presumably the "(with <tag>p:parameters</tag>)" at the end there 
actually reads "(with <tag>p:namespaces</tag>)"...

Jeni Tennison
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 14:08:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC