Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 2.8 through 4.2

/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| That still reads weirdly to me. What about:
|
|   "When a pipeline needs to process a sequence of documents using a
|    subpipeline that only processes a single document, the p:for-each
|    construct can be used as a wrapper around that subpipeline."

That works for me to. (I hope this level of word-smithing detail is an
indication that we're ready to go to last call :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The public! The public! How many fools
http://nwalsh.com/            | does it take to make up a public?--
                              | Chamfort