W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Comments on August 10 editors' draft through section 2.6

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:27:18 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5babsiz5q1.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> | 2.3 Primary Inputs and Outputs:
> |
> |  I'm not happy that the definitions of primary i/o are contractdicted
> |  by the prose which immediately follows.  I suggest they be rewritten
> |  along the following lines:
> I like your proposed text, but I don't see any contradiction in what
> follows. Clue, please?

Um, some misunderstandings, too much water under the bridge, the net
result, i.e. the prose in the 22 Aug. draft, is fine.

> |  Overall, I am a bit worried about the bulleted lists here, as they
> |  are not all exactly right -- perhaps at the end of the section we
> |  could add something such as
> Where is "here"?

Oops -- back towards the end of 2.2.  They are closer to correct now,
I guess this has been overtaken. . .

- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:27:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT