W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: New draft: 10 Aug

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:50:14 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0708220950y1e65e454ka0f5c7e63deddfca@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org, "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>

On 8/21/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Alex, please make sure you look for comments to you!
>
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | (Sorry Big mail)
> |
> | s/7.1.1 Add Attributes/7.1.1 Add Attribute/ (remove the extra s)
> | s/Expries/Expires/
> | s/availble/available/
>
> Fixed.

s/Expries/Expires/
This one is die hard...
A brand new one
s/containd/contained/


> | In application of this
> |
> | Example 10,
> | p:parameters step,
> | p:xslt step,
> | p:xslt2 step,
> | p:xsl-formatter step,
> | and p:xquery step should add sequence="yes" to input port="parameters"
>
> Fixed, I think.

Almost, but not for Example 10


>
> | --
> | In the declaration of component, no distinction is made between XSLT
> | pattern and XPath expression : please make the distinction
> |
> | <p:viewport
> |   name? = NCName
> |   match = XPath expression><!-- should be XSLT pattern instead -->
> | </p:viewport>
> |
> | <p:when
> |   name? = NCName
> |   test = XPath expression><!-- is ok -->
> | </p:when>
>
> Fixed.

Great !
Is it possible to make something equivalent for Standard step library ?

>
> | Remove unneeded sequence="no" in p:add-attribute
> |
> | Please add sequence="yes" to output port=result in p:add-xml-base or
> | remove it from input port="source"
>
> I think Alex fixed those.

Great !

> | It seems option=all need to have a default value to 'no', and
> | option=relative also
>
> Ok.

This raise the question of whether we could have boolean with *no*
default value at all ?

Some more adding following the new draft

In 7.1.15 Namespace Rename
elements-only and element-only (Choose one)


In 7.3 Serialization Options
standalone is not really a boolean since it has 'omit' value


Please update examples with the new boolean rules (true/false, instead
of yes/no)


Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2007 16:50:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT