W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: New draft: 10 Aug

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:13:32 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0708210913r5cf71483gb3ab01b073603535@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org, "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>

On 8/21/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Alex, please make sure you look for comments to you!
>
> | Also don't we need the xmlns() scheme for resolving pipeline inside p:librairy ?
>
> I don't think so, names are always NCNames.

?? Inside p:librairy ?? I knew that inside p:pipeline all is NCName
but p:pipelineS are QNames in p:librairy, right ?

>
> | Rephrase second bullet
> |
> | [[
> | If the element is the document element and *there is no explicit has
> | no xml:base attribute*, an xml:base attribute is added with the value
> | set to the element's base URI.
> | ]]
> | see between stars
>
> I don't understand the change.

Sorry, I don't propose change : I just point out that the part between
stars in not understandable

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 16:13:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT