W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: First stab at p:namespaces

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:37:26 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2lkc4rj9l.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Even I can understand it :)
| So it seems sensible
| Little remarks
| * p:to-xml is a bit too generic, I prefer a p:context-node-to-xml or
| something like

I think with the addition of an 'option' attribute to p:namespaces, we no
longer need to to-xml step, whatever it was called.

| * we will need an ignore-prefixes attrbiutes on p:namespaces for
| exluding generic prefix (ex, my, etc...)

Right. Done.

| * it is said "This example will succeed as long as the
| caller-specified option does not bind the "h:" prefix to an
| inconsistent namespace name."
| I'm puzzled by this assertion, in my understanding the step won`t fail
| if *none* of the prefixes are differently bound (including "ex" and
| "p" in the example)

Right. But I don't think there's any possibility of any other prefix having
a conflicting binding in this example.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No victor believes in chance.--
http://nwalsh.com/            | Nietzsche

Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 15:36:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC