W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:17:04 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0708140717t6b2baeck87189397be7040c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 8/13/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok let's see where we stand
>
> I think the better of both world (say XSLT and boolean XPath) is to
> allow everywhere someone has to type something to have (yes/no) and
> (true/false) for the case this value could be given by XPath
>
> I think, this is already the case in XProc

I stand corrected there.  I sure don't remember when we decided to
allow "true" and "false" as well as "yes" and "no".

All of the options that are boolean for the step library need to be
reworked slightly to make sure they allow the value "true" and "false" as well.

-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2007 14:17:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT