W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Last call draft?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:03:15 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87sl6r8b64.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Typo :
| s/p:validate-schematrong/p:validate-schematron/

Fixed.

| Say value, better than number :
| s/specified by this document, the number is "1.0"/specified by this
| document, the value is "1.0"/

Fixed.

| Use hyphenated :
| s/notmatched/not-matched/

Fixed.

| The port above is primary=yes so it is just redondant
| s/<p:input port="schemas" sequence="yes" primary="no"/>/<p:input
| port="schemas" sequence="yes" />/

Alex must have done this one already.

| On 8/3/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
|> I don't think I made any changes not discussed in email, save one. I
|> moved the err:errors/err:error elements into the c: namespace. We
|> don't really need a third just for errors, do we? Seems like overkill.
|
| In 4.6.1.1 c:errors and 4.6.1.2 c:error
| I still see errors in the err namepace which is no more defined ?
| I still see err:XS.... for errors themselves

Fixed.

| --
| "It is a static error (err:XS0020) to specify the sequence attribute
| on a parameter input with any value other than "yes"."
|
| You mean "yes" or "true" ? same everywhere else and for "no" or "false"


Fixed.

| Make two kind definition in accordance
|
| "The kind attribute distinguishes between the two kinds of inputs:
| document inputs and parameter inputs. An input port is a document
| input port if kind is specified with the value "document" or if kind
| is not specified."
| and
| "The kind attribute distinguishes between the two kinds of inputs:
| document inputs and parameter inputs. An input port is a parameter
| input port only if the kind attribute is specified with the value
| "parameter". It is a static error (err:XS0033) to specify any kind of
| input other than "document" or "parameter"."

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Is it still wrong?

| p:equal
|
| Should the output port result be *non primary* because of the case of
| using "fail-if-not-equal" to "yes" ?

I don't see how that matters. If fail-if-not-equal is yes, then the
step will abort and its output won't matter either way.

| In 2.3 Primary Inputs and Outputs
|
| You speak about "primary input", but the example make the distinction
| between document and parameters ? Especially the sentence with "has
| exactly one input/output port"
| I think the confusion come from the fact that "Document Input Port"
| are named "Input Port"

I think I clarified that a little bit. The note at the bottom of that
section does say that parameter input ports are special.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | What good is a can of worms if you
http://nwalsh.com/            | never open it?--Bob Arning

Received on Friday, 10 August 2007 19:03:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT