Also on the 9 Aug 2007 call, Mohamed asked us to reconsider our decision to support defaulted input and output ports on p:pipeline so that this sort of pipeline is valid: <p:pipeline xmlns:p="..."> <p:identity/> <p:pipeline> We didn't get to that item either, but I'm anxious to see what we can closed. We did discuss this in a previous call and the status quo is that this is legal. Does anyone else want to revisit that decision? (Mohamed, this is your queue to explain why you think we've made a mistake ;-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | You can parody and make fun of almost http://nwalsh.com/ | anything, but that does not turn the | universe into a caricature.--Bernard | BerensonReceived on Thursday, 9 August 2007 18:29:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT