W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Remarks on p:directory-list

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:49:14 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0708080949s6fcee537tc5c398174d05bb14@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 8/8/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | I still do prefer to replace
> | <p:option name="recursive" value="no"/>
> |
> | by
> | <p:option name="recursion-level" value="0"/>
>
> In the 2 Aug minutes, we decided to leave out *both* recursion *and* a
> depth for V1. Alex, what motivated you to put them back?
>

That's just a cut-n-paste error.  The option shouldn't be there as the text
forbids doing recursion.


-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 16:49:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT