Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 17 July 2007

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| On 7/20/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
|> == Typos ==
|> s/Analagous/Analogous/
|> s/Expries/Expires/
|> s/inlcude-content-type/include-content-type/
|> s/paramters/parameters/
|>
|> == 3.6 Ignored namespaces ==
|> Please precise that instead of
|>
|> "otherwise it must behave as if the element had not been present."
|>
|> it is
|>
|> "otherwise it must behave as if the element AND ITS CONTENT had not
|> been present."
|
| Also about Ignored namespaces
| 1) what about elements inside p:inline ?

I think that's covered by 

  Inline documents are considered “quoted”. The pipeline processor
  passes them literally to the port, even if they contain elements
  from the XProc namespace or ignored namespaces that would have other
  semantics outside of the p:inline.

| 2) what about attributes ?

Which ones?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Worrying is the most natural and
http://nwalsh.com/            | spontaneous of all human functions. It
                              | is time to acknowledge this, perhaps
                              | even to learn to do it better.--Lewis
                              | Thomas