W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: interupting processing

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:43:58 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0704301443r6f32378bpdb86d84eca8538e2@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 4/30/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | It occurs to me that now we are processing a sequence of document in
> | many steps, it could be interesting to interupt the processing at some
> | points
> |
> | I imagine that we can put the "interuptible" step in a try/catch and
> | throw an error
> |
> | But what about, especially in p:for-each of a p:break element ?
>
> I'm not sure that fits our processing model very well.


I don't see why ?


I can easily
> imagine having all the branches of a for-each executing in parallel;


hum...how do you ensure the order on the output ?? you need to make the
process end in good order
Worse : what if you use p:http-request inside the for-each ? And if you put
a try catch ?

what would break mean then?



It mean all the process  that have been started after should be interupted

Mohamed

>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 21:44:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT