W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Other steps

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:54:59 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0704301354s307aa5a8t414bdb46dc6835aa@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 4/30/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> hum...but how do you define a new step with the ability to contain
> subpipelines then ?

That you can't do.  You'd need a non-interoperable extension element to do

It would be interesting to have a macro-like facility for this.  I can't see
to tackle that in this version of the specification.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 20:55:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:42 UTC