W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Error vocabulary

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:12:39 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87hcr4hfmg.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say:
| Is the idea here that we could have a stack of errors? For instance,
| if style.xsl is called from pipeline.xpl, we could have:
| <err:errors name="foo" type="p:xslt">
|    <error code="p:error" href="style.xsl" line="400" column="30">You
| blew it, kid</error>
|    <error code="p:error" href="pipeline.xpl" line="200" column="20"/>
| </err:errors>

Yes. I think we've already said explicitly that the nature of errors
is pretty open-ended. The failure of one step can clearly cause
the failure of others. Some steps may generate more than one
error, etc.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | My problems start when the smarter
http://nwalsh.com/            | bears and the dumber visitors
                              | intersect.--Steve Thompson, wildlife
                              | biologist at Yosemite National Park

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 11:12:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:42 UTC