W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Parameter value/select

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:10:57 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0704161210m3fcbb17aja68aad76026c5b8@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

Norm,

I won't oppose any resistance to remove the @value one because we
already have the ability to do <p:parameter
name="bar">foo</p:parameter>, and trying to stick to the principle to
try to avoid multiple way to do the same thing

Mohamed

On 4/16/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> Three test cases with
>
>   <p:parameter name="foo" select="5"/>
>   <p:parameter name="bar" value="$foo+1"/>
>
> has solidified my believe that that having both @value and @select on
> p:parameter and p:option is a recipe for user confusion.
>
> Are we really sure that's worth the pain?
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 19:11:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT