W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: p:catalog

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 10:17:36 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0704071017j60c76237i27305c0792031650@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 4/6/07, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alex Milowski writes:
>
> > While caching has been declared dead, this is a great solution
> > for a user of a pipeline in that they can run two separate pipelines.
> > One produces a set of documents that are put into the catalog
> > or cache and the second uses that cache via an implementation
> > defined feature.
>
> Don't agree -- still wouldn't work for Richard, as I understand his
> objection (consider again the stylesheet with an xsl:include), and if
> it _would_ work, however it would work would be appropriate for
> 'fixing' my proposal to add a 'cache' port to p:group.


Applications cache "GET" requests on http urls all the time.  I can't
see how we can disallow an implementation from allowing a user that
option when they deploy their pipeline.


-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2007 17:17:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT