-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard and I had already come to a similar conclusion, indeed at the semantic level we think "from URI" should _also_ be a component, so that there's no funniness at that level at all---all inputs come from flows/pipes/whatever. Which suggests that the _syntax_ of <p:input> doesn't need to change at all, just that it provides a shorthand for the use of a 'document' component that is not available for <p:choose>. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFEp9KkjnJixAXWBoRAsq1AJ4zVKmPKVKxie04Dfsr8GMICzhhBACffg1t uKHg3kd/7oQL83bmKEpLt20= =dyw6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 14:19:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:48 GMT