W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: [p:]declare-step vs [p:]declare-component

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:28:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4523C520.9020209@jenitennison.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

Hi,

Alex Milowski wrote:
> When declaring a type that can be used as a value of a 'type' attribute 
> on 'step', I think we're declaring a signature of some 'component' and
> it should be named something like:
> 
>    * [p:]declare-component or,
>    * [p:]declare-signature or,
>    * [p:]declare-component-signature or,
>    * [p:]declare-component-type.

I agree. [p:]declare-step-type or [p:]declare-step-signature would be 
other options.

(And I think we need a definition of 'step type'.)

Cheers,

Jeni
-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 14:28:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT