- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:46:31 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Erik Bruchez wrote: > > Alex Milowski wrote: > > > 1. Step must be able to refer to other steps that are > > siblings (preceding and following) otherwise you > > can't connected steps at all. > > "Preceding siblings" would be enough IMO. I don't think we want to limit to preceding siblings. If a user wants to structure their pipeline "logically" from their perspective, such a limitation would get in the way. I can't see how it is any issue for an implementer. Similarly, if a user can't easily determine "before" or just wants to quickly insert a step into their pipeline, they shouldn't have to figure out what "preceding sibling" means just to do that. --Alex Milowski
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 16:46:51 UTC