- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:24:35 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/19/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> Having p:param and p:with-param but using p:input and p:output in both
> places just seems confusing.
Agreed. My preference at this point goes to:
<p:pipeline name="mySubsteps">
<p:param .../>
<p:input .../>
<p:output .../>
</p:pipeline>
and
<p:step name="mySubsteps">
<p:with-param .../>
<p:with-input .../>
<p:with-output .../>
</p:step>
The downside is added verbosity while the upside is that we make a
clear difference between:
a) Declaring an input or parameter with <p:input> or <p:param>
b) Passing data to an input or parameter with <p:with-input> or <p:with-param>
Alex
--
Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Friday, 19 May 2006 22:24:45 UTC