W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2006

Re: HST's take on Richard Tobin's conditional proposal

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:22:07 +0000
To: "Alessandro Vernet" <avernet@orbeon.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bbqvycuvk.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alessandro Vernet writes:

> What you illustrate in those examples is similar to what was shown in
> examples earlier by Norm and me in this list: the "choose" works on an
> infoset (or sequence of infosets?) and expression for each branch is
> expressed with an XPath expression.
>
> Is this a fair statement, or am I missing the point of your example?

The point of my example was that the 'inputs' to the 'branches' are
specified independently of the 'input' to the 'choose' itself.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEIXmvkjnJixAXWBoRAoFAAJ4rQxUUFSoTg0SdF25ewoqImTw9xQCffpbm
ZjTQxHTe+V0An/rjFtiOHNM=
=8JAh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:22:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:47 GMT