W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Sub-pipelines

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:25:52 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87veue4dj3.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say:
| Backtracking a little bit: I agree that we need sub-pipelines, that
| is, the ability to call a pipeline from a pipeline. However, do we
| really need to be able to define those sub-pipelines in the same XML
| file?

I don't know.

I think that as soon as we introduce conditionals, we increase the
need for subroutines because the "if" and "else" branches may have a
lot of common steps.

We could force the user to define those steps in external pipeline,
but my experience with XSLT (which required any import precedence work
to be done with external modules) suggests that it's a tedious burden.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 15:26:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:47 GMT