W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Minimal requirements for XPath usage

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:55:10 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87ac8o7q41.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
|  <pipe>
|   <step process="xsdValidate">
|    <input name="schemaDoc" href="my.xsd"/>
|   </step>
|   <step process="xslt1.0">
|    <input name="stylesheet" href="my.xsl"/>
|   </step>
|  </pipe>

This pipeline has implicitly a single, anonymous input document.
Some of the other examples we've discussed have had explicit input
documents, for example,

    <input name="document"/>
    <input name="schema"/>

Is it your view that we shouldn't allow pipelines like this in 1.0? If
not, do you have a view for how to generalize the syntax you've

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:50:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC