W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2006

Re: p:pipeline

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:34:41 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87u053t8u6.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| There's another option:
|
| 5. A new container element *and* nested sub-pipelines

Bah. Can't we have a belt *or* suspenders? :-)

I'm convinced to use option 3 (a p:pipelines element)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 14:34:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:48 GMT