W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2006

Re: p:for-each

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:25:37 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0607251925x212e8524m4fa88bb1db827d95@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 7/24/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> Yikes! You're suggesting that if there are three documents on #pipe/document
> (a, b, and c) and two stylesheets on #pipe/stylesheets (x and y), that
> the step gets evaluated (a, x), (a, y), (b, x), (b, y), (c, x), (c, y) times?
> I think that's *way* too confusing.


Do you have a use case in mind where this type of combination would be
useful? For now, like Norm, I find this somewhat confusing. However I
agree with you on allowing multiple outputs for the <p:for-each>; it
definitely makes sense.

Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 02:25:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC