Norman Walsh wrote: > A step looks like: > > step := ($kind, with-input*, with-output*) Here I think the the 'with-*' is just extra syntax we don't need. The containment of the input/output in the step doesn't require a "with-" prefix anymore than at the pipeline level. > > Where $kind identifies the kind of process. That must either match the > name of some in-scope p:pipeline elment or match one of an > implementation-defined list of known process types. > > with-input := ($name, $from, $href, {any content}) Shouldn't the 'from' be consistent with the attribute use at the pipeline level for the 'input' construct? > > The valid names depend on the $kind of step. Each can either come from > the output of some other step or input (in which case the $from must > match one of those labels) or from a URI or from content. It must have > exactly one of those. > > with-output := ($name, $label) Again, 'label' conflicts with 'name' for me... --Alex MilowskiReceived on Wednesday, 19 July 2006 21:54:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:48 GMT