Re: XDM blog entry

From: Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:57:40 +0000 Message-ID: <43D10874.7010702@di.fc.ul.pt> To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> CC: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:46 GMT

Alex Milowski wrote:
> 
> 
> Can you list these for me?
> 

Sure. Here they go: 5.7, 5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.15, 5.16, 5.19, and 5.21.
After _another_ pass, 5.23 refers HTML, so it sums up to 9 use cases.

> Maybe we should consolidate serialization issues into one use case? 
> That's an important feature of any XML processing technology and we
> can, hopefully, point to the work done by XSLT 2.0/XQuery to facilitate
> our futher spec work.
> 

I agree, but I believe we should consolidate this into two use cases:

   1) Non-XML inputs (deserialization)
   2) Non-XML outputs (serialization)

I'm not sure if XQuery/RNG should be in a separate use case, or a 
special case of 1), 2), or both.

Rui