Re: What is passed between processes?

Jeni Tennison wrote:

> I think it's vitally important that we make the clear distinction
> between the *information* that's passed between components and the
> *interface* that's used to pass that information between components.

[...]

> But I'm absolutely convinced that we have a requirement to somehow
> cater for processes that work on serialised XML and augmented infosets
> as well as vanilla infosets, and that we need to say something about
> what gets passed between components (though not *how* it gets passed)
> to explain what level of interopeability people can expect between
> pipeline engines.

Agreed 100%.

-Erik