W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2006

Re: Requirements

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:59:28 +0000
To: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bzmmazmvz.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Hash: SHA1

Alessandro Vernet writes:

> 3. The make the discussion easier in this working group, we should
> agree on a common vocabulary and come up with a set of definitions
> sooner than later. For the sake of this list, we will use the
> following vocabulary. The "language" refers to the XML Processing
> Language. A specific file in the language is referred to as a
> "process". The language allows the use of "XML processors" like XSLT,
> W3C schema validation, SOAP call. A specific call to an XML processor
> in a process is an "operation".

I agree we'll need a standard terminology sooner or later.  For what
it's worth in the past I've used
 'pipeline' for the thing itself,
 'pipeline document' for an XML document in the 'pipeline language',
 'component' for the thing that carries out a '(pipeline) step'.

- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 15:59:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:38 UTC