W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Requirements Document Updated

From: Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:26:47 +0000
Message-ID: <43F09727.9000406@di.fc.ul.pt>
To: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
CC: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Erik Bruchez wrote:
> I am not 100% we have built a strong case for parameters. It looks like 
> they are only needed for XSLT. Do we have other use cases?

In the followup of Alex's reply, I also believe parameters should be 
separate from inputs. If we want to reuse some pipeline, we may allow 
its reuse through parameterization. This enforces some standardization 
of parameter specification for (at least) XSLT and blackboxed pipelines.

> My fear is that now, will will have two concepts: "input" and 
> "parameters". They won't work the same, and the question of how or 
> whether a step can produce data which gets connected to a "parameter" 
> remains open.

My feeling is that parameters should not be bound to data, but to 
component configurability. Therefore, we should be careful on allowing 
connection between data and parameters.


Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 14:27:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:39 UTC