W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Re: Simplification of proposal for subordinate source elements

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:46:53 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87wt4l1f36.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| I really like these names, and the consolidation of <p:external> and <p:here>
| into <p:document>.

So I didn't implement that part of the proposal. Scold the editor if
you wish.

For one thing, it puts us back in another case where we have two names
for three things. For another, I don't much like the fallback story
that someone proposed. We have a fallback mechanism, p:try, do we
really need to invent others in V1?

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 14:47:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:41 UTC