W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Spec progress

From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:16:22 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
At 03:32 PM 8/18/2006 +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>[lots of good comments elided...]
>A last general comment: I can understand why you've separated the language 
>constructs from the syntax for those language constructs, but I think it 
>would be easier to understand what's intended if they weren't separated. 
>In my view, the syntax specifications (and examples) help to explain the 
>abstract notions. If you were thinking of reorganising anyway, take this 
>as a nudge to do so.
Please consider this a nudge in favor of the status quo. I particularly 
appreciate the
fact that the abstract notions are understandable and discussable without 
to refer to syntax. I also appreciate reading the how-to (read: syntax) 
being distracted by the abstract notions.

Your mileage may vary.
Received on Friday, 18 August 2006 15:47:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC