- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:16:31 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 8/8/06, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > The other language constructs (<choose>, <for-each> and <viewport>) > follow the same kind of scheme, though because, in abstract, they take > pipeline definitions as input, there's some magic involved. I'll try to > make some suggestions in another mail if there's interest in taking this > naming scheme forwards. Jeni, Yes, please! It looks very promising so far, and it would be interesting to see where this goes when it comes to <p:for-each> and <p:choose>. (Jeni seems to master cliffhangers, which seems to be a lost art on technical mailing lists!) Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 07:16:44 UTC