On 8/8/06, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > The other language constructs (<choose>, <for-each> and <viewport>) > follow the same kind of scheme, though because, in abstract, they take > pipeline definitions as input, there's some magic involved. I'll try to > make some suggestions in another mail if there's interest in taking this > naming scheme forwards. Jeni, Yes, please! It looks very promising so far, and it would be interesting to see where this goes when it comes to <p:for-each> and <p:choose>. (Jeni seems to master cliffhangers, which seems to be a lost art on technical mailing lists!) Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 07:16:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:48 GMT