W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Naming

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:16:31 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0608090016l3675fb5dy7c75bac83021ee67@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 8/8/06, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
> The other language constructs (<choose>, <for-each> and <viewport>)
> follow the same kind of scheme, though because, in abstract, they take
> pipeline definitions as input, there's some magic involved. I'll try to
> make some suggestions in another mail if there's interest in taking this
> naming scheme forwards.


Yes, please! It looks very promising so far, and it would be
interesting to see where this goes when it comes to <p:for-each> and
<p:choose>. (Jeni seems to master cliffhangers, which seems to be a
lost art on technical mailing lists!)

Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 07:16:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC