W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: A side-effect example

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:02:59 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0604271102ye236a9fi95416aac0130c98b@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 4/27/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> I think it boils down to "produces the same results as an
> implementation known to be conformant". This moves the whole caching
> issue off to a quality of implementation consideration.

I agree, this is good way to put it.

Alex
--
Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2006 18:03:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:47 GMT