W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Inputs/outputs and auxiliary documents

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:25:38 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0604191825q263360f3h6eede86544bbd88c@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 4/13/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> Alex proposes, if I understood correctly, that we can solve both of
> these problems if we make the auxiliary document relationship
> explicit:
> [...]

This solution is fairly similar to what I describe a comment attached
to the related issue on Bugzilla:


Alex and Alex (hem, Alessandro) are thinking alike :).

Both involve an auxiliary input to the second step and make the
connection between the first and second step explicit in the pipeline.
The main difference with the solution in Bugzilla being that (a) the
steps are connected by assigning a label to the output of the first
step, and making a reference to that label in the second step and (b)
the resource manager only intercepts URI that are in a given scheme.

Alex (hem, Alessandro)
Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2006 01:25:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:39 UTC