W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Auxiliary documents

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:26:22 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0604121826s3202acb9hb6812217fb3e64ea@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 4/12/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> An agressively optimizing pipeline engine, unaware that mydoc.xml has
> an XInclude statement that refers to otherdoc.xml might reasonably
> assume that it doesn't need to run the xslt component. Or, if we have
> a rule that requires all components to run, that it can run the two
> components in parallel.


Regarding parallel execution of steps, I am fine with having the
language mandate that steps are not to be executed in parallel. I
haven't seen so far use cases that are calling for parallel execution,
and I feel we would make the language overly complex by addressing the
issue of parallel execution at this point.

If there is a need, a particular engine can implement an extension to
support parallel execution and based on that experience we can revisit
the question in a subsequent version of language.

This seems to be a fairly self contained issue, so I have created an
entry in Bugzilla:

Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2006 01:28:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:39 UTC