W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2012

On non xml

From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:35:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFtPEJZfqdtpPA0PBRycKrR65ZwN8spN961VTHAwYpPYLbqM_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
"Vojtech: Instead of changing XDM we should take a simple, pragmatic
approach.
... It's not full support for non-XML, it's stilly mainly an XML processing
language, it just makes things easier if you get non-XML." [
http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/04-minutes.html#item05]

Given this is a good idea above...Just wondering if it would be a good idea
to given the use of a resource manager to make it that non xml data input
or output would need to be stored in a resource manager and thus not need
to flow through the pipeline but rather be easily accessible.

Perhaps what would flow from a step that produced non-xml into the resource
manager would be some xml letting the user know something related to it's
storage in the resource manager.

Regards

-- 
-

Alex G. Muir
Software Engineering Consultant
Linkedin Profile : http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/alex-muir/36/ab7/125
Love African Kora Music? Take a moment to listen to Gambia's - Amadu
Diabarte & Jali Bakary Konteh www.bafila.bandcamp.com Your support keeps
Africa's griot tradition alive... Cheers!
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 02:35:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 21 October 2012 02:35:58 GMT