W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Charsets, encodings, http-request, unescape-markup, and convenience, oh my!

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:55:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CADyR_r2noi9EWqYvWa24KYD7hGeqVE5L8jc+7mZa3tE7VsbA+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On 11 October 2011 16:23, Norman Walsh wrote:


> I was thinking about an extension to support this when it
> occurred to me that it can be done in standard XProc.  I think.
> Anyone see any problems with this:


  Personally, I would have passed the c:request document directly
as the input, supporting all HTTP methods, and decoding all HTTP
bodies in the response (single- or multi-part...)

  Such a step would actually act exactly as a proxy around the
standard p:http-request, decoding the HTTP documents if any.

  BTW, I've packaged the 4 steps a thttp://xproc.org/library into
a single one XAR package:


  What do you think?


Florent Georges
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:56:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:27 UTC