W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2011

Re: XML processor profiles makes optional features look less optional

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:34:44 +0100
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b4o5u8ivf.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Speaking only for myself, and following other similar comments, would
paying more attention to the standalone pseudo-attribute in the XML
declaration work better?

That is, what if the Recommended profile required (external subset
processing or failure) iff standalone='no' ?

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNrY90kjnJixAXWBoRApiaAJ4ldurTWQ6E62pfMqRtShi5Ds9rmwCfT8ht
5Wc3+qo9X5W3PzA9O/qkrbw=
=gNVG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 13:35:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 April 2011 13:35:20 GMT