- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:34:44 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Speaking only for myself, and following other similar comments, would
paying more attention to the standalone pseudo-attribute in the XML
declaration work better?
That is, what if the Recommended profile required (external subset
processing or failure) iff standalone='no' ?
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNrY90kjnJixAXWBoRApiaAJ4ldurTWQ6E62pfMqRtShi5Ds9rmwCfT8ht
5Wc3+qo9X5W3PzA9O/qkrbw=
=gNVG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 13:35:20 UTC