W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > June 2010

Re: XML processor profiles: XML Base processing

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:45:13 +0100
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bbpbuvjsm.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bjoern Hoehrmann writes:

>   In http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xml-proc-profiles-20100518/ section 3
> there is a requirement "Maintenance of the base URI property of each
> element in conformance with [XML Base]". This requirement needs to be
> elaborated in at least two ways. Firstly, it needs to be identified
> whose property the "base URI" property is; secondly, it is difficult to
> see what effect the requirement has beyond affecting XInclude processing
> for which the requirement is already implied.

We've tried to address your first request in a draft of next WD [1], [2].

Wrt your second request, the reason point (2) of the minimum and basic
profiles references XML Base is in keeping with the overall goal of
this spec: to provide a single point of reference for other specs. to
use to get a carefully defined statement of what their 'front end'
must do.  So, we're referencing XML Base and requiring conformance so
that specs which reference us don't have to.  Do you think this
actually needs to be spelled out?  It seemed to us that we got what we
wanted by the normative reference to XML Base. . .

Please signal if you are content with this resolution of your request.

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/diff.html
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFMBSsJkjnJixAXWBoRAv9fAJ9vz84aKIqoh1VUngO70SYsUP6UHwCfcL8B
8i+5eI+BnWdwKIpja1iGGko=
=Xvz4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 15:45:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 1 June 2010 15:45:44 GMT